k418 - page 248

ВестникНОМУС
.
Сборникматериалов
конкурса
литературных
обзоров
-2012
248
15.
ХарченкоВ
.
П
.,
Рожкова
Н
.
И
.
Лучевая
диагностика
заболеваний
молочной
железы
,
лечение
и
реабилитация
.//
Выпуск
3. «
Лучевая
синд
-
ромная
диагностика
заболеваниймолочнойжелезы
М
. 2000. 166
с
.
16.
ШкольникЛ
.
Д
.,
Левшуков
Д
.
Е
.
Диагностика
непальпируемых
новообразований
молочной
железы
.//
Современные
технологии
в
клиническойбольнице
.
Москва
. - 2002. -
С
. 61-65.
17. American Cancer Society. Detailed Guide: Breast Cancer: What Are the Key
Statistics for Breast Cancer?AmericanCancer SocietyCancer Resource Information.
–Available at
.
18.SchonbergMA, RamananRA,McCarthyEP,Marcantonio ER. Decisionmaking and
counseling around mammography screening for women aged 80 or older. – J Gen
InternMed. –Sep 2006; 21(9): 979–85.
19.Badgwell BD, Giordano SH, Duan ZZ, Fang S, Bedrosian I, Kuerer HM, et al.
Mammography Before Diagnosis Among Women Age 80 Years and Older With
Breast Cancer. – JClinOncol. –Apr 212008.
20.American College of Radiology. ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System
(BI-RADS)Web site. –Available at
.
21.Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA. Mammographic
characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography
and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. – Radiology. – Apr
2001;219(1):192–202.
22.NakaharaH, Namba K,WakamatsuH,Watanabe R, FurusawaH, ShirouzuM, et al.
Extension of breast cancer: comparison of CT and MRI. – Radiat Med. – Jan-Feb
2002; 20(1):17–23.
23.Uematsu T, SanoM, Homma K. In vitro high-resolution helical CT of small axillary
lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer: correlation of CT and histology. – AJR
Am J. Roentgenol. –Apr 2001;176(4):1069–74.
24.Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH. Comparison of the performance of screening
mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that
influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations. – Radiology. – Oct 2002;
225(1): 165–75.
25.Kopans DB. Negative mammographic and US findings do not help exclude breast
cancer. –Radiology. –Mar 2002;222(3):857-8; author reply858–9.
26.Zonderland HM, Coerkamp EG, Hermans J, et al. Diagnosis of breast cancer:
contribution ofUS as an adjunct tomammography. –Radiology. –Nov 1999; 213(2):
413–22.
27.Zonderland HM. The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast cancer. – Semin
UltrasoundCTMR. –Aug 2000;21(4): 317–24.
28.Taillefer R. The role of 99mTc-sestamibi and other conventional
radiopharmaceuticals in breast cancer diagnosis. – Semin Nucl Med. – Jan 1999;
29(1):16–40.
29.Vineeta Singh; Christobel Saunders; Liz Wylie; Anita Bourke. – New Diagnostic
Techniques forBreast CancerDetection. –FutureOncology, 03, 2008.
1...,238,239,240,241,242,243,244,245,246,247 249,250,251,252,253,254,255,256,257,258,...663
Powered by FlippingBook